Category: Dev

  • TextMate for IntelliJ users

    TextMate for IntelliJ users

    I use IntelliJ IDEA. I also use TextMate. The fact that I spend most of my day in IntelliJ means I’m used to IntelliJ’s keyboard mapping which happens to be slightly different from TextMate’s.

    The biggest difference I found was with the Home and End keys and the Delete Line mapping. So here’s how to make TextMate work more like IntelliJ.

    Change Home and End keys

    From this old blog post:
    Create the custom KeyBindings folder (if it doesn’t already exist):

    mkdir ~/Library/KeyBindings

    Create a key bindings file called DefaultKeyBinding.dict in this directory with the following content:

    {
        /* home */
        "\UF729"  = "moveToBeginningOfLine:";
        "$\UF729" = "moveToBeginningOfLineAndModifySelection:";
    
        /* end */
        "\UF72B"  = "moveToEndOfLine:";
        "$\UF72B" = "moveToEndOfLineAndModifySelection:";
    
        /* page up/down */
        "\UF72C"  = "pageUp:";
        "\UF72D"  = "pageDown:";
    }

    Change Delete Line mapping

    Go to Bundles > Bundle Editor > Show Bundle Editor.
    In text bundle, change Delete Line from CTRL+K to CMD+DELETE.
    In the text bundle, Delete to Beginning of Line macro, click the X to remove the same binding.

    Change Duplicate Line mapping

    While you are there you might also want to change the Duplicate Line / Selection mapping to CMD+D

  • Devoxx – Project Coin, Defective Java and the Social Network

    Devoxx – Project Coin, Defective Java and the Social Network

    Joe Darcy and Maurizio Cimadamore gave a preview of the changes coming up in Project Coin. These are small changes to the Java language that will be added to Java 7. They all look pretty useful and include:

    • Strings in switch
    • Collection literals
    • <> (generic type inference)
    • Multicatch
    catch (ClassNotFoundException | NoSuchMethodException e) {
        // Do something
        throw(e);
    }

    Bill Pugh’s session was as popular as expected for his talk about defective code and how static analysis with FindBugs can help. I’ve heard Bill talk about this stuff before but this time he was emphasising that not all bugs are equal. All code has bugs but some mistakes don’t really matter.

    Google’s code has over 1000 null pointer bugs but few if any NullPointerExceptions in running code are caused by these. You need to determine which bugs are worth your time to fix.

    The most important bugs are generally those which can cost you money on the first day they manifest themselves and those bugs that occur silently. This is why Bill is a fan of runtime exceptions; if something unexpected happens, you want to know about it.

    Devoxx is held in a massive cinema complex and so after all the talks today the organisers put on a showing of The Social Network, a movie about the founders of Facebook. I really enjoyed the film. All the performances were great and I really liked the soundtrack by Trent Reznor. You don’t need to be a geek to enjoy this film. I don’t know how much of it is actually true but it paints an interesting picture of Mark Zuckerberg and draws nice connections between our concepts of ‘friendship’.

  • Devoxx – Improve the performance of your Spring app

    Devoxx – Improve the performance of your Spring app

    This talk by Costin Leau was about the new caching features in Spring 3.1.

    After going over some problems you can face when caching (stale data, thrashing, distributed caches) and different caching patterns he introduced the declarative caching of Spring 3.1.

    It uses AOP and can be declared on methods by adding the @Cacheable annotation. This annotation caches a method’s return value using it’s parameters as the key although this can be customised.

    Eg:

    @Cacheable
    public Owner loadOwner(int id);
    
    @Cacheable("owners")
    public Owner loadOwner(int id);
    
    // Using Spring expression language
    @Cacheable(key="tag.name")
    public Owner loadOwner(Tag tag, Date created);
    
    @Cacheable(key="T(someType).hash(name)")
    public Owner loadOwner(String name);
    
    // Only cache on condition
    @Cacheable(condition="name < 10")
    public Owner loadOwner(String name, Date created);

    The @CacheEvict annotation invalidates the cache:

    @CacheEvict
    public void deleteOwner(int id);
    
    @CacheEvict("owners", key="id")
    public void deleteOwner(int id, boolean saveCopy);
    
    @CacheEvict(name="owners", allEntries=true)
    public void batchUpdate()

    You can also use your own stereotype annotations. Instead of spreading @Cacheable everywhere:

    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    @Target({ElementType.METHOD})
    @Cacheable("results")
    public @interface SlowService {
    
    }
    
    @SlowService
    public Source search(String tag) {...}

    Spring is not a cache provider itself. You plug in your own cache provider (ehcache, JBoss Cache, etc).

  • Devoxx – Performance Anxiety

    Devoxx – Performance Anxiety

    I doubt Joshua Bloch suffers from performance anxiety but it was slightly ironic that there were some technical problems before he started his talk, titled Performance Anxiety, to an absolutely packed room at Devoxx today. I knew it would be a popular session so I got there early and so managed to find a seat, unlike the others who sat on the steps or crowded the doorway.

    His talk was about microbenchmarking – measuring the performance of a small piece of code as opposed to profiling an application.

    In the good old days performance could be estimated simply by counting program instructions. Now it is simply impossible to do this because of the ‘abstraction gap’. As code has become more and more complex it has become harder and harder to estimate and measure the performance. Complexity and predictability are inversely related.

    Even benchmarking code doesn’t really work with consecutive runs often showing a variance of 20%. The code and systems are so complex nobody really knows where this variance comes from.

    The solution is to run a bunch of JVMs in sequence and then statistically analyse the data (mean, median, standard dev, etc).

    Basically, benchmarking is really, really hard and most benchmarks are seriously broken. Either the results are unrelated to the test or the error bars exceed the measured values.

    Caliper is microbenchmarking framework from Google which can help.

  • Devoxx – The Next Big JVM Language

    Devoxx – The Next Big JVM Language

    Stephen Colebourne gave an entertaining talk to a packed room called The Next Big JVM Language. He went over the features of such new JVM languages as Groovy, Clojure, Scala and Fantom (which I’d never heard of).

    He seemed to be leaning toward Fantom as the language of choice before delivering the punchline that the best candidate for the Next Big Language might be a backwards incompatible version of Java itself.

    I think I agree. Oracle should get rid of all that legacy crap in JDK 9.

  • Devoxx day two

    Devoxx day two

    A couple of pretty heavy-going sessions at Devoxx today. First up was Cassandra by Example with Jonathan Ellis one of the founders of Cassandra support company Riptano.

    I have already had some experience with Cassandra at both my previous and current jobs but it was good to go over the principals of Cassandra as well as seeing an example application deconstructed.

    Cassandra’s strengths are:

    • Scalability
    • Reliability
    • No single point of failure
    • Multiple data centre support
    • Integrated Hadoop support (lets you run map reduce jobs on data in Cassandra without any ETL)

    Of course Cassandra is not ACID and has limited support for OLTP ad-hoc queries. However, companies that have really scaled traditional RDBMSs like MySQL or Oracle end up dispensing with these features anyway in order to achieve that scale.

    Jonathan had an interesting quote from Twitter:

    It used to take 2 weeks to perform an ALTER TABLE on the tweets table

    This is  definitely something I can sympathise with. If you don’t plan ahead it can be easy to suddenly find your tables are so big they cannot be changed without serious pain, downtime or both.

    When designing a relational schema we tend to think of objects and relationships. With Cassandra we need to think of objects and the queries we want to run against them. For each type of query you will need a column family (something like a table).

    When choosing a key for rows, a natural key is best. If you need a surrogate key, use a UUID as integers may create collisions due to the distributed nature of Cassandra. Version 1 UUIDs can be sorted by time but if you don’t need time ordering, use version 4 UUID.

    Using Thrift directly should be avoided at all costs in favour of higher level libraries like Hector. There is a JPA implementation called Kundera but this is based around Lucene so unless search is an important part of your application it may not be the best choice.

    The afternoon was spent learning what’s new in Hibernate with Emmanuel Bernard from JBoss.

    Fetch profiles can be defined and chosen at runtime, eg:

    @Entity
    @FetchProfile(name = "all",
        fetchOverrides = {
            @FetchProfile.FetchOverride(
                entity = Customer.class,
                association = "orders",
                mode = FetchMode.JOIN)
            @FetchProfile.FetchOverride(
                entity = Order.class,
                association = "country",
                mode = FetchMode.JOIN)
    })
    
    public class Customer {
        @Id @GeneratedValue private long id;
        private String name;
        private long customerNumber;
        @OneToMany private Set<Order> orders;
    
    // standard getter/setter
    }
    
    Session session = ...;
    session.enableFetchProfile( "all" );  // name matches @FetchProfile name
    Customer customer = (Customer) session.get( Customer.class, customerId );
    session.disableFetchProfile( "all" ); // or just close the session
    

    A lot of time was spent on the Criteria API which lets you write object oriented, type-safe and strongly typed queries.

    Hibernate Search provides lucene-based full text search for Hibernate and looks quite neat. You get transparent index synchronisation and support for clustering and loading of massive indexes.

    Hibernate Envers also looks really interesting. This is a framework for dealing with historical data in Hibernate.

    Entities are versioned and all changes (insert, update, delete) are audited transparently. The existing tables are unchanged but new audit tables are created for each entity. For example a Person table will get a Person_AUD table. This looks the same with the addition of revision number and revision type (add, delete, modify) columns.

    You can look up by revision and query by revision or entity history. You can also define a RevisionEntity to add new fields atop the standard revision number and date.

    It looks really helpful for auditing and dealing with historical data although there is of course a performance hit to inserts, updates and deletes as the audit table must be written to as well.